The accuracy of intelligent body fat scale depe¶"∞nds on the excellence of technicians.

Even good technicians have positive and nega≈★tive factors in reading. Hey g✔•uys, I just used the Reese In‍≠₹telligent Body Fat Sλ¶★cale soon. Now that I've bee£∏∑εn exercising for less than♣✔< a year, I began to worry that mε✘ φy weight would reach 22€± 0 kilograms. On a bad day, I stood on an in‌δtelligent body fat scale and found that it∏₩  had exceeded 160 kilogr​↓ams. I posted pictures of myself and w ×βent online to do a Bmi test and said my b®♦§✘ody fat was 25 and more.What I saw yest←™•erday was that it was 11% higher thφ÷an my peers. What do my ph>‍otos tell you? I still have abdominal fat, a≥εnd even though my friends told me, I✘§β™ still think I'm fat. I←↔✔→ want to exercise my muscles and ε•lose fat. Besides, the fat on m "y back is 19%. It's strange th↕♠at I have more fat on my back tha±÷₹♣n on my front. Anyway, do you think I ¶ ∞$need to lose more fat? I we♠₹¥‌nt to the gym for more than a year. I€ &™ worked about 5 to 6 days a wee✘γλ≠k. I ate very vegetarian food♦♠. I often weighed myself with an intelliαπ±↑gent body fat scale. × Now I'm fluctuating between 160 ☆↑¶and 164 kilograms.

I estimate that your age will increase yo↓σur fat growth rate by about 10% in midε$dle and old age. Age i'✘☆s a factor. If you look the same as you  $$"but are 20 years you∞Ω♠πnger, I guess you will bε∏☆♣e between middle age and de☆ε§cades old. In addition, bf% is only the $≠number we can use for reγ☆∑ference. Suppose you tesε£t the intelligent fat scale i←∑n a few percent tomorrow¶$, and you test it again in six weeks usin÷×g the same method as§∞σ$ the intelligent fat scale, and it's y percenδ∞§♦t. As long as y is less than, you can‌σ☆£ be sure that you have made some progre♦₩​λss. It's true that all the₽δ←φ numbers are good for the IMO.

Besides, I don't thi<§↓∏nk you need to lose any more weφ Ω←ight. If it were me, I would worry about sw→♦‌✔elling and adding some muscle.¥£≥ Use an intelligent body fat scal≠£ e. The percentage of bod $☆∏y fat is the result of the ratio of two variables∑α: fat mass and lean weight. If you gain∑→ lean weight, you can reduce your percentage§λ≠λ of body fat without losing weight.

If you lose weight well when you lose we✘​ight. Body fat is called BMI. As λ€∑you may know, an intelligent body fa ¶t scale may have a very inaccurate BMI♦∞↕ . People with limite±∏ d weight knowledge and β≥φ$experience will have greater differences in ∑÷÷λreading. To get the most accur÷♥ate reading, you need to ♦•÷&use a pen, tape measure and mea✘αsure the exact position each time. Me‍λn are not required to read ≤↓in the chest, abdomen, t✘​≠highs and back. Women are r•↔α§eflected in the abdomin≈  al area of the back of the arm and thighs.

Intelligent body fat scale better readin₽δ®g comes from letting others read↑§βα, body fat percentage

What matters is your appearance and feeling ​. It's worth mentioning that BMI is nσ©♠$ot a percentage. It's a number that c‌¥αomes from a formula. The only variable is heig"'✔'ht and weight. That's why the numbers (25 to σ®✘11) are not near each•→ other as mentioned above. For<÷✘ anyone with any "above averaΩ☆→₩ge" muscle mass, t¥β♥÷he BMI shows the usual number. According toφ✔'↓ a BS number, this is not in the equation. Iλ→₹ was fat on the BMI scaleΩ→★$ of the body fat scale and laughed loudly. I made₽σ a mistake in my personal data. I☆★ wasn't 45 hectares ≠♠®old at 24.

Thank you. I didn'±‍t do it myself, but we did follow γ​✘the right way. I also sto©✔∑↕red my fat on my back. ε ∞₹I have fat on my lower back and upp↓$≤er back, but I have very little front. So it♠•¥α9;s not surprising. If you want an abdom‍>₹inal muscle, some people might say it∑∑'s lucky. I'd rather be ripped, s ♦o I hate my back fat.

Self-measurement of Intellige <αnt Body Fat Scale

Normally you can't get the accurate rΩ∑∑eading of the intelligent body fat scale by♣₽ε€ yourself. I can almost guarantee that yo™₽≠‍u haven't formed it correctly in ad ↓↓♥vance. In fact, you say your back is 19%€↓. This clearly shows that there is no way you ca∞δn reach and get the correct reading. The second↑♦® point is that you need an excellent≠←←¶ intelligent body fat sc£∏₩✔ale to get good results. Reading, excellent inte©∑‍≤lligent body fat scal∏•e you need to use the right wa™<y to read hundreds of times, you do not kno<₽  w how to correctly pre-f♣∑orm it, you do not have t∏≠he actual "real world" e$↑xperience.

Yes, I got where you came from. I'm get¥÷ ↑ting fat on my back, but I haven't really do☆≤£ne a lot of back exercises. I&÷∏#39;m going to pay more attentiε♣on to it and see how it works.γ↔ I get the impression that you don't know ₩§♠what I mean. The key is that you can&₽Ωβ#39;t get accurate readings u>₽₩nless you have long orangutan arms that allo$→ εw your arms to measure "precisel♠↔y" behind your back.

The general smart fat ₩¥scale shows 19% body fat. Yo>$×♠u said you measured 19% of your back.

But if it's true, your overall&¥®≈ health rate is 11%, which means that ™∞♥✘your other readings need to be very high to reac<∑h the 11% overall average, and you $$÷≠need to spend hundreds of readings to really mas£&≤ter it. I want to reiterate that$γ♥ unless you use tapes and pens to‍$ mark the exact location, you're w↓©∏&rong, and most cheap calipers will g®€÷ive you one. It gives yo•≤u an image of the course by givi↑$ng instructions on w≤♥here and how to measure ¥σπ it.

Back fat does not reduce the amo★α♠↓unt of fat in a particular β×area by using exercises for that particular musc₹>≥le group. Back exercise increa₹λses muscle mass but has littlσβ​‍e effect on reducing bo≥©₹↔dy fat in that area. Another interesting ©★∑factor to see is that many  ✔¶people's self-evaluation is what they see a✔"≥™nd nobody sees it, so I doubt if you or the body↑<♣ fat scale can actua•→•lly measure a lot of fat stored on yourφεα back.